Found this great article on the AIA Knowlege Community website by Richard Morrison, Architect in Redwood City:
I am finding most of these answers to a fairly
simple question -- "How much does a set of plans cost?" -- to be
quite depressing, because they fail to distinguish between cost and value, and
don't help a prospect to understand that there is a fundamental difference.
Let's say you are shopping for tax preparation services, and you ask a bunch of
budget tax services how much a "tax return costs." You get answers
ranging from $500 to $1,500. (I'm going to assume that they will all come up
with roughly the same calculation in the end.) Then, deciding to ask a
top-notch CPA firm, you get quoted $5,000. For some reason, you go with the
expensive CPA, who, after analyzing your tax situation, says, "You know,
if you were to incorporate, and move these direct expenses over to the corporation
along with a different type of retirement account, you could save $6,000 a year
in your overall taxes." Which is the "cheapest" tax service now?
How much does that expensive CPA "cost"? I think the correct answer
is that the CPA is, essentially, even less than "free." You are being
PAID to use them.
Similarly, good architects have the opportunity to create substantial value,
both monetary and psychological: better (i.e. more comprehensive) sets of plans
allow for apples-to-apples bids, reducing contractors' built-in contingencies.
Fewer problems during construction. (Reduced headaches!) Increased resale
value. Better quality control. Someone to help with problems during
construction. Easier planning entitlement process. Etc., etc. Frankly, if I couldn't
produce at least 10% more overall value over an unlicensed drafting service, I
would probably take down my shingle.
It seems that the public--- and architects, too, for that matter -- have the
mindset that every dollar spent for an architect is a dollar that isn't
available for construction. Nothing could be further from the truth. The answer
to the question "How much does a set of plans cost?" OUGHT to be
"With me, often free or even less." At least, that response should
start the discussion of price vs. value.
Showing posts with label architectural fees. Show all posts
Showing posts with label architectural fees. Show all posts
Friday, June 2, 2017
Wednesday, February 11, 2015
A couple of A&E cost-saving tips
MEP Engineering vs. Design/Build:
For small tenant improvement projects under $1 million in a space for which no MEP as-built drawings are available, it’s much more cost-effective to go with a design/build approach in lieu of hiring MEP engineers to field verify and engineer the project. Instead MEP engineers can create a performance spec/bridging document for the design/build contractors to design to, and also perform a review of the design/build drawings.
Client Changes in the Construction Document Phase:
Many clients want to make minor changes to the scope of a project in the Construction Document phase. Changes to the CD’s are very time consuming, thus expensive, and can cost a client a ton in Additional Services fees. One minor changes affects multiple sheets of drawings, so this is to be avoided and is the purpose for the methodical step-by-step process of the previous phases (programming, conceptual design, schematic design, design development).
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)